I know there are several ways of calculating prices etc, but using the Retail Price Index (RPI), and average earnings, for my house purchases (Reply#1), gives these figures, so far as I can make out:
Between 1953 and 1970, the RPI rose 1.8 times, average earnings rose 2.9 times, and the value of my house rose 1.7 times. Because that was a cash sale and probably a bit less than I could have got otherwise, I’m guessing that house prices generally kept pace with the RPI. Thus a person could climb the housing ladder even without climbing the earnings ladder.
Between 1970 and 2007, the RPI rose about 11 times, average earnings about 20 times, and the value of my house rose about 35 times.
My contention is that it would have been better if the 1953-1970 conditions had continued, even though our houses would been worth less.
And, no, I’m not going to do the same calculations for tents
